Archive
Peter Thiel on the Triumph of the Counter-Elites
Peter Thiel discusses why many peers support Trump, why Kamala lost the election, and why the Trump 2.0 team will be better with antiestablishment figures willing to rethink the system. A discussion on the border, trade, student debt, Israel, foreign policy, historical revisionism, skepticism vs. conspiracy, and his views on World War III.
The Dear Hunter
President Joe Biden’s decision to pardon his son, Hunter Biden, on December 1, 2024, has sparked a storm of controversy—though perhaps not for everyone. After all, this is the same president who, just six months earlier, assured the nation that he would never use his office to shield his son. His emphatic “No” when asked about the possibility of a pardon was hailed as a shining example of moral integrity. “A president who respects the law,” they said. How quaint. Mainstream media jumped at the chance to applaud Biden for his supposed restraint. The New York Times praised his commitment to the Justice Department’s independence, and The Washington Post eagerly contrasted Biden’s supposed integrity with Donald Trump’s alleged disregard for democratic norms. They painted Biden as the anti-Trump: the moral compass in a sea of political chaos. It was all very inspiring.But now, with Hunter enjoying a full and unconditional pardon, that carefully curated narrative lies in tatters. The same man who was celebrated for respecting the judicial process has handed his son a free pass, leaving those glowing endorsements of Biden’s integrity looking a tad premature. Will the media, which once rushed to his defense, admit they were duped? Probably not. Mea culpas don’t exactly pair well with their editorial agendas. What we’re left with is a glaring double standard. Biden’s actions undermine the very principles he was lauded for upholding. The media, so quick to heap praise, now faces a choice: acknowledge their role in propping up a false narrative or remain conveniently silent. Either way, this pardon will stand as a reminder that in politics, integrity often takes a backseat to convenience—and the media’s willingness to cheer from the sidelines isn’t helping anyone see the truth.
The New Jersey Drone Problem
Since mid-November 2024, residents across New Jersey have reported sightings of large, mysterious drones operating under the cover of night. Described as “car-sized” or “SUV-sized,” these drones have been seen flying in formations or swarms, equipped with bright lights and exhibiting impressive agility. On occasion, they have even been observed “going dark” when spotted.
The sightings have been concentrated near sensitive locations, including the Picatinny Arsenal, a military research facility, and the Trump National Golf Club in Bedminster. These areas’ significance has raised questions about the purpose and origin of these drones, prompting a federal investigation.
The FBI, in collaboration with local law enforcement, is actively pursuing leads and has called on the public to share photos, videos, or information. In response, the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) has issued temporary flight restrictions over the affected areas to ensure airspace safety and prevent unauthorized drone activity.
Despite widespread concern, New Jersey Governor Phil Murphy has assured the public that there is “no known threat.” However, the persistent nature of the sightings has fueled speculation and heightened calls for transparency from federal agencies.
The drones’ operators and their motives remain unknown, leaving residents and officials grappling with potential security risks. While some suggest these could be part of unauthorized surveillance or tests, others fear more nefarious purposes.
As investigations continue, the sightings have sparked broader conversations about drone regulations and airspace security. For now, the drones remain an enigma, casting an eerie shadow over New Jersey’s night skies and leaving many wondering who—or what—is behind these mysterious flights.
Eric Adams meets Tom Holman
In 2022, New York City Mayor Eric Adams was a staunch advocate for immigrants, upholding the city’s status as a sanctuary city. He emphasized New York’s historical role as a haven for newcomers and declared the city’s commitment to welcoming asylum seekers. Faced with an unprecedented influx of migrants, Adams declared a state of emergency in October 2022, urging federal and state governments to provide immediate support. His administration framed the crisis as a humanitarian issue, focusing on compassion and aid for vulnerable populations.
By 2024, Adams’ stance on immigration had significantly shifted, shaped by ongoing challenges and growing public concern over crime and resource strain. In a notable turn, Adams met with Tom Homan, President-elect Donald Trump’s incoming border czar, in December 2024. Together, they discussed strategies for addressing violent crime among undocumented immigrants. Adams expressed agreement with Homan on the need to prioritize public safety, signaling a departure from his earlier rhetoric.
Adams has since advocated for deporting migrants charged with serious crimes before conviction, marking a clear pivot from his prior stance. He argued that New York City should not serve as a safe haven for dangerous criminals, regardless of immigration status. This change reflects Adams’ balancing act between managing the ongoing migrant crisis and addressing concerns about public safety.
The shift in Adams’ position highlights the complexities of navigating immigration policy at a local level amidst national debate. His evolution from an advocate for sanctuary policies to a collaborator on enforcement underscores the challenges cities face in maintaining public safety while managing the humanitarian aspects of immigration. Adams’ journey mirrors broader tensions in the national conversation, illustrating the difficult choices leaders must make in the face of evolving realities.
Rome, Unreal.
Step into the heart of ancient Rome like never before with this stunning walking tour of a Rome-inspired Italian town, rendered in Unreal Engine 5.4. Created by Scans Factory, this tech demo showcases the extraordinary capabilities of photorealistic graphics, blending historical charm with cutting-edge technology. From cobblestone streets to intricate architectural details, every frame immerses you in a breathtakingly lifelike recreation of the Eternal City. This video captures the tech demo’s gameplay at Ultra settings using an RTX 4090 graphics card on a 4K monitor, pushing visual fidelity to its peak. The RTX 4090, NVIDIA’s flagship GPU, offers unmatched performance with 24GB of GDDR6X memory, advanced ray tracing, and DLSS 3 technology, making it the ultimate choice for 4K gaming and photorealistic rendering. Its capabilities enable this demo to achieve smooth frame rates and unparalleled detail.Unreal Engine 5’s advanced features, including Nanite geometry and Lumen lighting, are amplified by the power of the RTX 4090, resulting in a truly immersive experience. Whether you’re an architecture enthusiast, a gamer, or simply love exploring virtual worlds, this walking tour is a feast for the senses.
The Hidden War on Tech and Free Speech
In his latest appearance on The Joe Rogan Experience, venture capitalist Marc Andreessen discussed the practice of “debanking” in the U.S., focusing on its impact on tech and cryptocurrency sectors. He explained that, over the past four years, approximately 30 tech founders have lost access to banking services, leading some to shift industries or relocate internationally.
Andreessen linked this practice to Operation Chokepoint, a policy from the Obama administration designed to restrict financial services to certain industries. He noted that similar strategies have been applied more broadly in recent years, targeting emerging technologies like cryptocurrency, which operate outside traditional financial systems.
The conversation also explored the implications of governmental involvement in artificial intelligence, highlighting the potential for centralized control to influence speech, decision-making, and public access to information. Andreessen emphasized the importance of ensuring that AI technologies are used to empower individuals rather than restrict freedoms.
Taking place shortly after the 2024 election, the interview provided insights into the evolving relationship between technology, politics, and regulation. Andreessen’s perspectives highlighted the challenges of balancing innovation with oversight, raising important questions about how to maintain technological progress while protecting individual rights and freedoms in an increasingly digital world.
The Death of Brian
On December 4, 2024, the tragic murder of Brian Thompson, CEO of UnitedHealthcare, sent shockwaves through the corporate and healthcare worlds. Thompson was fatally shot outside the New York Hilton Midtown by a masked gunman, later identified as Luigi Mangione, a 26-year-old tech entrepreneur. Following a five-day manhunt, Mangione was apprehended in Pennsylvania, carrying a 3D-printed firearm, a manifesto criticizing corporate America, and fake IDs.
The incident drew intense public scrutiny, particularly given UnitedHealthcare’s recent challenges, including a February 2024 ransomware attack targeting its subsidiary, Change Healthcare. The breach, orchestrated by the ALPHV/BlackCat group, disrupted nationwide services and required investigations by Palo Alto Networks and Mandiant. Speculation arose due to Nancy Pelosi’s February 2024 investment in Palo Alto Networks, with some questioning whether her financial interests could have intersected with these events. However, there is no evidence linking her trades to the attack or Thompson’s murder.
Further complicating the narrative were rumors that Thompson was set to testify against Pelosi in an insider trading case. Fact-checking efforts have debunked these claims, confirming no connection between Thompson and any legal proceedings involving Pelosi.
The interplay of high-profile events—the ransomware attack, Thompson’s murder, Pelosi’s investment disclosures, and Mangione’s manifesto—has fueled conspiracy theories and highlighted the tense intersection of politics, finance, and corporate accountability. As the investigation into Thompson’s murder continues, it serves as a reminder of the complex dynamics between technology, governance, and public trust.
Army vs Navy
The Army-Navy Game, an iconic tradition in American college football, is more than just a sports rivalry. It’s a celebration of honor, discipline, and the enduring commitment of those who serve in the United States Army and United States Navy. Played annually since 1890, this game is the pinnacle of service academy football and symbolizes the camaraderie and competition between these two branches of the armed forces.
The game is traditionally held on the second Saturday in December, often at neutral venues like Philadelphia, chosen for its accessibility to both the U.S. Military Academy at West Point and the U.S. Naval Academy in Annapolis. The event serves as the final regular-season game in college football, a stand-alone spectacle that captivates the nation. It’s steeped in traditions, including the iconic "March On" of cadets and midshipmen, the emotional singing of each academy’s alma mater after the game, and the unforgettable battle for the prestigious Commander-in-Chief’s Trophy.
Today’s Army-Navy clash in Foxborough, Massachusetts, promises to add another thrilling chapter to this historic rivalry. Army leads the all-time series 54–49–7, but Navy has dominated much of the 21st century. This game represents far more than just a football rivalry—it’s a rare moment when the nation collectively pauses to honor the young men and women who sacrifice their college years for the promise of service.
Both teams enter the game with passionate fan bases and fierce determination. For the players, this is the culmination of their season and the ultimate bragging rights. As the stands fill with cadets, midshipmen, and alumni, the Army-Navy Game remains a shining example of sportsmanship and patriotism, a reminder of the shared values that bind these two proud institutions together.
December 23
On December 23, 1888, Dutch painter Vincent van Gogh, deeply affected by severe mental health challenges, famously cut off part of his ear after a volatile confrontation with fellow artist Paul Gauguin in Arles, France. This dramatic incident is among the most well-known episodes in art history, often viewed as a poignant reflection of van Gogh’s turbulent psychological state and extraordinary artistic genius. Following the altercation, van Gogh reportedly wrapped the severed portion of his ear and delivered it to a woman at a nearby brothel, further adding to the enigmatic nature of the event. This incident marked a significant deterioration in van Gogh’s mental condition, which subsequently led to his voluntary admission to a psychiatric asylum. Remarkably, despite his mental health struggles, this period of his life became one of his most artistically productive. During his time at the asylum, he created some of his most iconic works, including Starry Night. The act of self-mutilation has since become a powerful symbol of the interplay between emotional distress and artistic brilliance, sparking ongoing discussions about the connection between creativity and mental health. Today, van Gogh is celebrated not only for his revolutionary contributions to art but also for the tragic depth of his personal story. His vibrant, emotionally charged paintings continue to captivate audiences worldwide, serving as enduring reminders of the complex relationship between suffering and creative expression.
Hail to the Engineer
In December 2024, Washington, D.C., became the battleground for a fierce debate over a massive government funding bill. The original 1,547-page proposal, designed to finance government operations, drew immediate criticism for its complexity and inclusion of unrelated provisions. Critics argued that it was emblematic of a bloated bureaucracy, hidden agendas, and a lack of transparency in governance. Enter Elon Musk, co-chair of the newly established Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE), and known for his unorthodox approach to solving systemic inefficiencies. Musk, leveraging his vast social media influence on X, lambasted the bill. In a scathing post, he called it “a bloated piece of pork,” warning that any Republican who voted for it would face electoral consequences in two years. His message ignited a wave of public scrutiny and galvanized conservative lawmakers to demand changes. Musk’s critique wasn’t merely rhetorical. Behind the scenes, he and his co-chair, Vivek Ramaswamy, were actively advising congressional allies on how to trim the bill. They advocated for stripping away provisions unrelated to the bill’s primary purpose and eliminating redundancy. Musk described the process as akin to engineering—removing unnecessary parts to create a streamlined, functional design. The pressure worked. In response to growing backlash, lawmakers reconvened to overhaul the bill. Over the course of intense negotiations, the original 1,547-page proposal was slashed down to just 116 pages. The revised version focused strictly on essential government funding, eliminating non-funding-related provisions, pork-barrel spending, and unrelated legislative riders. Musk hailed the new version as “a model for transparent governance,” sharing a side-by-side image of the two versions on X with a call for citizens to demand more clarity from their leaders. The impact was immediate and polarizing. Supporters praised the reduction as a win for democracy, celebrating the removal of opaque provisions that often hide in lengthy bills. Critics, however, argued that the trimming process might have overlooked critical details, raising concerns about the potential for rushed decision-making. Although the revised bill ultimately failed to pass with a two-thirds majority in the House, the entire episode sparked a larger conversation about government transparency and efficiency. It highlighted the growing influence of private-sector leaders like Musk and Ramaswamy in reshaping how government operates. This moment became more than a battle over one piece of legislation—it symbolized a potential shift in the balance of power, where public scrutiny and demands for simplicity challenged the entrenched norms of policymaking in Washington. Musk and Ramaswamy’s efforts underscored the possibility of a leaner, more accountable government and inspired a new wave of calls for reform.
A Paradigm Shift
President-elect Donald Trump’s diplomatic approach fundamentally disrupted established norms, prioritizing direct engagement and unorthodox methods. One illustrative instance occurred at a dinner at Mar-a-Lago, where Trump provocatively suggested to Canadian Prime Minister Justin Trudeau that Canada might join the United States as its 51st state. While likely a facetious remark, the comment arose amidst discussions on proposed U.S. tariffs, exemplifying Trump’s penchant for provocative statements as a means to steer diplomatic dialogue. This anecdote, though seemingly inconsequential, underscores a consistent feature of Trump’s diplomatic strategy: leveraging unpredictability to command attention and shape high-stakes negotiations. Trump’s overarching diplomatic strategy was characterized by direct and personal interactions with world leaders, often bypassing traditional protocols. In June 2019, Trump became the first sitting U.S. president to cross into North Korea, engaging directly with Kim Jong-un at the Demilitarized Zone. This unprecedented act, aimed at alleviating nuclear tensions on the Korean Peninsula, epitomized Trump’s belief in the efficacy of personal diplomacy as a mechanism for conflict resolution. The symbolism of this event extended beyond immediate negotiations, illustrating Trump’s willingness to redefine the boundaries of presidential diplomacy.
Shame, shame, shame. Same.
In December 2024, ABC News reached a settlement with President-elect Donald Trump, agreeing to pay $16 million to resolve a defamation lawsuit. The lawsuit stemmed from statements made by ABC News anchor George Stephanopoulos, who incorrectly asserted that Trump had been found liable for rape in a civil case involving writer E. Jean Carroll. In reality, the jury had found Trump liable for sexual abuse and defamation, not rape. The settlement terms included a $15 million donation to Trump's forthcoming presidential library and museum, an additional $1 million to cover Trump's legal fees, and a public apology from ABC News expressing regret for the inaccuracies. This decision was influenced by concerns over potential reputational damage and the desire to avoid a protracted legal battle. Internally, the settlement caused significant unrest within ABC News. Journalists and producers expressed frustration, believing that the network should have contested the lawsuit to uphold journalistic integrity and press freedom. Anchor George Stephanopoulos was reportedly "apoplectic" and "humiliated" by the network's decision to settle and issue an apology. This settlement has broader implications for the media industry. It is perceived as a victory for Trump and may encourage similar legal actions against news organizations, potentially leading to a chilling effect on journalistic practices. Media professionals and legal experts express concern that such settlements could embolden public figures to pursue defamation claims, thereby undermining press freedom. However, press freedom is intrinsically linked to the principles of fairness, accuracy, and responsibility. Journalists are entrusted with the duty to report the truth and maintain the public's trust. When serious false allegations are presented as facts, it not only damages the reputation of the individuals involved but also erodes the credibility of the press as a whole. Therefore, holding journalists accountable for inaccuracies is essential to uphold the integrity of the media. ABC News's settlement with Donald Trump over defamation claims highlights the complex interplay between media organizations and public figures, raising critical questions about journalistic responsibility, legal strategy, and the future of press freedom in an increasingly litigious environment.
The New Jersey Drone Swarms
Since mid-November 2024, reports of mysterious drones over New Jersey have sparked intrigue and concern. Described as SUV-sized and flying in coordinated formations, these drones have been spotted near sensitive locations such as military installations, including the Picatinny Arsenal, and critical infrastructure. Sightings have spread to nearby states like New York and Pennsylvania, raising questions about their origin and purpose. Could these drones represent a classified U.S. military test involving AI-controlled swarm technology? Drone swarms, guided by advanced artificial intelligence, are at the forefront of modern military innovation. Capable of autonomous coordination, they can perform complex tasks like surveillance, strategic maneuvers, or even defensive operations. If these sightings are part of a U.S. initiative, the drones' coordinated movements and lack of identifiable electronic signatures could align with the characteristics of AI-driven swarm technology. While federal agencies such as the FBI and the Department of Homeland Security have stated they’ve found no evidence of a national security threat, the lack of transparency leaves the public speculating. Adding to the mystery is President-elect Donald Trump’s statement suggesting the drones should be shot down, which has only heightened the public’s curiosity. Officials have ruled out connections to U.S. or foreign military operations, but this hasn’t quelled concerns. Meanwhile, incidents like a toy drone crash in Pequannock Township—a hobbyist’s device—don’t account for the large, organized formations reported across the region. Amid the drone spectacle, another story quietly unfolds: **New Jersey’s significant upgrades to its cybersecurity infrastructure.** An NJ.com article from December 5, 2024, detailed new initiatives to bolster the state’s defenses against cyberattacks, focusing on critical facilities like Picatinny Arsenal. These upgrades include enhanced protections for utilities, transportation systems, and government networks, reflecting a broader effort to safeguard against both digital and physical threats. The timing raises questions—could these cybersecurity enhancements be linked to the drone activity? Are these sightings a distraction or even a test for integrated systems combining physical and digital security measures? If this is indeed a test of cutting-edge technology, it represents the convergence of artificial intelligence, defense strategies, and cybersecurity. The secrecy surrounding the drones might be due to their sensitive nature, especially if they’re tied to national defense. While the drones have captured public attention, the underlying advancements in cybersecurity may be equally significant, suggesting that New Jersey is quietly positioning itself at the forefront of integrated security innovation. Until federal agencies provide clearer answers, the mystery continues to provoke questions about the balance between transparency, technological progress, and national security.
A Case Study in European Innovation
The 2024 European Innovation Scoreboard crowned Denmark as the EU's leading innovator, surpassing long-standing leaders like Sweden. This accolade invites a deeper exploration: how did Denmark ascend to this position? Was it the result of decades-long strategic planning or nimble responses to global trends? The truth lies in a skillful blend of foresight and adaptability. Denmark's leadership in innovation is far from coincidental. The country has pursued a deliberate strategy of investing in critical areas that underpin innovation. One cornerstone of Denmark's success is its commitment to education. By fostering lifelong learning, with participation rates more than double the EU average, Denmark ensures that its workforce continuously acquires the skills needed to navigate technological advances. This emphasis on education has created a culture of innovation where individuals are well-equipped to harness and develop new ideas. Another pivotal factor is Denmark's early and sustained investment in digital transformation. High-quality broadband infrastructure and widespread digital literacy initiatives have enabled the country to cultivate a digitally competent population. This robust digital foundation supports businesses and communities in embracing and driving technological innovation. Research and development (R&D) also stand at the heart of Denmark's innovation ecosystem. Both public and private sectors contribute significantly, resulting in a steady stream of scientific publications and patents. Complementing these efforts, Danish government policies have consistently aligned with industrial needs, fostering a synergistic environment where innovation thrives. Adapting to a Changing World While strategic planning established a strong foundation, Denmark's ability to adapt to global shifts has been equally vital. Several key areas illustrate its flexibility and responsiveness. Denmark has emerged as a global leader in climate technology, recognizing early the opportunities within the green transition. Companies like Grundfos and Danfoss have spearheaded innovations in environmental sustainability, aligning their efforts with EU climate goals. These advancements have placed Denmark at the forefront of eco-innovation, addressing pressing global challenges while bolstering its economy. In robotics, Denmark has capitalized on its engineering expertise to create a thriving industry. Odense, often called the "robotics capital of Europe," hosts over 120 robotics companies. This success stems from Denmark's ability to blend its educational strengths with industry needs, ensuring a steady pipeline of talent and innovation in this transformative sector. The life sciences sector further highlights Denmark's adaptability. Firms like Novo Nordisk have made groundbreaking advancements in pharmaceuticals and biotechnology, addressing critical health challenges on a global scale. This focus not only reinforces Denmark's reputation as a hub for innovation but also drives significant economic growth. The Interplay of Planning and Adaptability Denmark's innovation success story reflects the interplay between strategic planning and adaptability. Decades of investments in education, infrastructure, and R&D laid the groundwork for success. However, the country's ability to identify and capitalize on emerging opportunities—from climate tech to robotics—has ensured its continued relevance in a rapidly evolving world. Lessons for Aspiring Innovators Denmark's journey offers a roadmap for nations seeking to enhance their innovation capabilities. Sustained investment in foundational areas like education and infrastructure is crucial. However, agility—the ability to pivot and embrace emerging sectors—is equally important. A defining feature of Denmark's approach has been the strong collaboration between public and private sectors. By aligning governmental policies with industry demands, Denmark has created a fertile environment for innovation, demonstrating the power of cooperative efforts. Denmark's rise to the top of the European Innovation Scoreboard exemplifies the strength of combining strategic foresight with adaptive policies. By balancing long-term planning with responsiveness to global trends, Denmark has cemented its position as a leader in innovation. As other nations face economic and technological challenges, Denmark's model provides a compelling blueprint for sustainable and forward-thinking growth.
Who is Willow?
Google’s Willow, the company’s latest quantum processor, represents a major breakthrough in quantum computing. Announced in December 2024, Willow builds on Google’s earlier efforts in quantum supremacy, addressing one of the field’s most persistent challenges: error correction. The chip completed a benchmark computation in under five minutes—a task that would take the world’s fastest classical supercomputer an estimated 10 septillion years, a timeframe that dwarfs the age of the universe. This highlights Willow’s unmatched computational power. Moreover, Willow has achieved significant advancements in error correction, a major obstacle in quantum computing. By increasing the number of qubits, the system successfully reduced error rates, demonstrating that scaling quantum systems can be done without sacrificing reliability. In another milestone, Willow maintained an error-corrected qubit in a stable state for an average of one hour. This remarkable stability is a promising step toward building large-scale, reliable quantum computers. While Willow is not yet capable of breaking modern cryptographic systems—an ability that would require millions of qubits—its advancements point to a future where quantum computing could revolutionize fields such as drug discovery, climate modeling, and logistics optimization. The unveiling of Willow has also boosted Alphabet Inc.’s market value, reflecting investor confidence in Google’s leadership in quantum technology. Although practical applications remain on the horizon, Willow’s success signals rapid progress in quantum computing, bringing the dream of solving previously intractable problems closer to reality. As Google continues to refine its quantum technologies, Willow stands as a testament to the transformative potential of quantum computing, paving the way for innovations that could redefine industries and reshape the world.
Mike Benz on Joe Rogan
Joe Rogan sits down with Mike Benz, a former State Department official and executive director of the Foundation for Freedom Online, for an in-depth conversation on government surveillance, censorship, and their impact on civil liberties in the digital age.
Drawing on his experience in government, Benz provides insights into how surveillance and oversight have evolved alongside technological advancements. He explores the delicate balance between national security and individual freedoms, emphasizing the risks of overreach by government agencies.
A key focus of their discussion is the role of intelligence agencies, particularly the CIA, in influencing culture and media, including historical cases where events like music festivals were allegedly used for covert operations. Benz sheds light on how these tactics extend into the digital realm, raising questions about transparency and accountability.
Rogan and Benz also delve into the ethics of modern surveillance, highlighting how advancements in digital tools have amplified monitoring capabilities. They discuss the implications for privacy and democracy, stressing the need for robust legal frameworks to protect individual rights.
This thought-provoking episode offers a critical examination of government power in an increasingly interconnected world, encouraging listeners to reflect on the importance of safeguarding freedom and privacy.
LLMs For curious beginners.
Understanding how large language models (LLMs) work is crucial for using them effectively. It helps users discern limitations, recognize biases, and set realistic expectations. Knowledge promotes trust in AI, and empowers individuals to leverage these tools effectively in communication, education, and problem-solving across industries.Here is Grant Sanderson of 3Blue1Brown explaining how Large Language Models work in the simplest way possible.
